Home / Camera & Photo / Digital Cameras / Electronics / Mirrorless Cameras
Post a Comment

  • Make sure this fits by entering your model number.
  • Full frame sensor - 47.3-Megapixel full-frame MOS sensor that provides a wide dynamic Range and excellent performance at high sensitivity (is 25600 Max sensitivity)
  • Lumix S camera lens - easy-to-use 24-105mm standard focal macro zoom F4 l-mount for Lumix S Series full-frame L-mount digital Mirrorless cameras
  • 4K video - up to 4K 60P/50P recording plus 6K PHOTO functions and HLG photo.
  • 187MP high resolution mode - a sensor shift technology suitable for taking very high-resolution Landscapes and fine art photos via tripod with toggleable motion correction capabilities
  • Rugged Mirrorless camera design - dust/splash*/freeze-resistant design withstands heavy field use under harsh conditions for high mobility.Image File Format: JPEG, RAW

Buy Now :

Brand : Panasonic
Category : Electronics,Camera & Photo,Digital Cameras,Mirrorless Cameras
Rating : 4.4
Price : US $3849
Review Count : 21













  • I wanted a full frame mirrorless that enabled 4K video as well. This does it.With 47 megapixels and up to 4K video at 60 frames per second, I am able to video basketball and volleyball games, and also follow high speed sprints on the track.I have a lengthy review on my blog.
  • Granted, motorsports can be easy, since you\'re panning the camera. still, no issues, handheld from the stands, pictures from the 105mm end are cropped like 8x still look sharp enough.I also used with a couple of Canon lenses, a 50mm 1.8 and a Tokina 16-28mm with the MC-21 adapter. Camera recognizes the Canon and the Zoom mm on the Tokina, so in body stabilization works. But Autofocus on the Canon hunts like hell, real fast on the Tokina for some reason. Happy.
  • A wonderful camera. Did everything I expected of it. Focusing was a little inconsistent but that could be either user unfamiliarity or something that can be addressed with firmware. All in all I found it to be a return to what a real camera should perform and feel like. I ended up not keeping it but that was nothing to do with the camera.
  • Professional Photography Camera !
  • The lense was demaged. I think, I was\'nt the first who open the box.
  • Last year I bought my first two full-frame digital cameras: the S1R, and a Canon. Before that, my only digital cameras were Micro Four Thirds. (For the thirty years before that, I shot everything on Mamiya M645 film cameras.)A year of use isn\'t always enough to get a really clear picture of a camera. But I\'ve been professionally shooting with the S1R and Canon three to five times a week, and making my living from them . . . so, I feel like I can talk a little bit about them.I can already tell, for instance, that the S1R is going age very gracefully. The controls are where you want them. (And if for the ones that aren\'t you can customize them to where you want.) The viewfinder is quite lovely, and the best non-mirror experience I\'ve had to date. I expect to use this camera for a very long time. And the Lumix S Pro 24-70mm f2.8 lens is quickly becoming one of my favorite go to lenses (I own the Lumix S Pro 16-35mm f4 also, but I use that almost exclusively for architectural work. Panasonic, if you\'re listening, please release a TS prime in the 18 to 24mm range, like yesterday. Preferably a TS 24mm. And primes, I need more primes in general.)It\'s big and heavy. And, the reason I\'ve stayed away from digital full-frames all this time is this: they\'re big and heavy and they don\'t deliver the goods—so why bother. Well . . . at 47MP, it\'s not as bad a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. (I did buy a Spider hip holster to get the weight off my neck for those longer walks—best money ever spent.) The high resolution mode, at 187MP, does not disappoint (that\'s the Mamiya that runs through my veins speaking).Is is as good as shooting on medium format film? No, of course not. I think, having done some napkin calculations before digital cameras were even made—and I still stand by this calculation all these years later—that it\'ll take a bare minimum of 250MP (and several more stops of dynamic range, and better sensor detection of blue) to reach what I got from medium format film.But I will say this. I think I picked the right time to step into the full-frame market. This camera feels like the future in my hands. And the Lumix glass I\'ve purchased so far will see me through it.As much as I love the Lumix S Pro 24-70mm f2.8, it hasn\'t stopped me from shooting with all my vintage Mamiya glass. (I went with C7adapters to get my M645 lenses in play. Very nice craftsmanship.) I\'m happy with how well that has worked out.Why not Canon, Nikon, Sony, or Fujifilm, etc? None of those are bad systems. I\'m not going to tell you that any one of them is so much better that you should only be shooting with one of them. The truth is that—for the vast majority of people—choosing one system over another often comes down to either personal idiosyncrasies, or it\'s because you bought into one of them and it\'s what you know. Canon, for example, is happy to sell you extremely well-priced lenses that over-perform like nobody\'s business. For me it comes down to Panasonic doing everything extremely well. (Cons: I\'d complain more about grabbing focus if not for the manual focus clutch. Now, I\'m completely addicted to manual focus clutches. So much so that I now find myself looking at exceptional—EXCEPTIONAL—glass and all I find myself thinking is: does it come with a manual focus clutch?
  • I rarely review anything, but now that I\'ve used this camera for several months, I can no longer neglect the need to share....Most of my experience is with Canon and Sony. I like well-built stuff. I like impressive images. This camera is astoundingly well-built and makes really impressive images. Every click of every dial is delicious. Every snap of every switch is satisfying. It even rivals my great (and old) 5x7 medium format film camera that was built the way things used to be built.But perhaps at least as important: this camera is wonderfully intuitive. The menu system and the accessibility to features by those switches and dials is a pleasure to behold. Things simply feel like they\'re where they belong. it doesn\'t take long to get used to, and once you\'re sold on the layout, nothing comes close. You find yourself saying, wait, \"that was too easy!\"Obviously, it\'s a beast. I don\'t have large hands, but it\'s still comfortable. I do have strong hands, which helps. I mostly use this on a monopod, but it works wonderfully handheld, too.I recently discovered the \"remote control\" app -- what an incredible design. Getting connected was a little awkward at first, but the app itself rivals Sony\'s by a long shot. Truly useful. Really neat. I\'m not normally a bells\'n\'whistles kind of guy, for things like this, but this sure makes family photos, including myself, really easy to get \"right\" - you can view the pose live before taking the shot, even zooming way in with one click for focus confirmation.And, of course, the images are astounding. Even with the \"kit\" lens (f4 24-105).Extremely pleased.
Location:

Post a Comment for " "