Nikon COOLPIX A900 Digital Camera (Black)

Nikon COOLPIX A900 Digital Camera (Black)

• Make sure this fits by entering your model number.
• 20MP 1/2.3\" BSI CMOS Sensor. Focal length : 4.3 to 151mm
• NIKKOR f/3.4-6.9 ED Lens. Bluetooth Specification Version 4.1
• 24-840mm (35mm Equivalent)
• 35x Optical Zoom Lens, 70x Dynamic Zoom. Dimensions: 4.5 in. x 2.7 in. x 1.6 in. excluding projections
• 3\" 921k-Dot Tilting LCD
• UHD 4K Video Recording at 30 fps

Buy Now : Nikon COOLPIX A900 Digital Camera (Black)

Brand : Nikon
Category : Electronics,Camera & Photo,Digital Cameras,Point & Shoot Digital Cameras
Rating : 4.1
Review Count : 287

Nikon COOLPIX A900 Digital Camera (Black)

• Had one before, so KNEW we\'d love it.What is really cool is that there was a little \"bag\" in the box for the camera AND they put an SD card in there!Also, you can tell whoever packed it REALLY cared that it didn\'t get damaged during shipping, they did a really good job.
• ...too heavy for me.
• I am a serious photographer and have been such since the year 2000. Although I travel with and shoot with a big Nikon D 7100 for important photos, I have used a small, compact Nikon Coolpix S8200 camera for fun and to sneak a small, but very good, camera into concerts and performances that do not allow photography. As a result, I have been able to take GREAT pictures, and some videos (at a distance of 200+ feet) of Cher, Santana, Eric Clapton, Andrea Bocelli, In Volo, and other celebrities. The S 8200 is a 16 MP camera and has a 14X zoom (4.5 - 63mm) and has served me VERY well for a camera that--at the time--cost less than $300.00 and is small, came with a handy leather case, and captures images almost as sharp and with the accurate colors as my big Nikon D7100! Then, about a month ago, I saw the Coolpix A900 on the Nikon website and decided to upgrade to a better small compact camera. I was NOT disappointed! The A900 is just as good (in terms of sharpness and color accuracy) and is only slightly larger than the S8200 but has more megapixels (20 MP) and more zoom (4.3 - 151mm) with almost the same aperture range as the S8200. Additionally, the A900 has WiFi and Bluetooth capability and, after downloading the free Nikon app, I can set my A900 to send my images to my iPhone in the event that I want to instantly send a picture to someone (but, obviously a better image than I could have captured with my iPhone\'s 8 MP, tiny lens camera) without waiting until I\'m in front of my home computer or laptop in my hotel room (when traveling) to send as an email attachment. The only thing that I wish the A900 has that my S8200 has, is the ability to easily see the metadata of an imageat the push of a dial, and the ability of the S8200 to automatically raise the flash when the camera is set to automatic; I\'m not sure that I like the fact that I have to manually raise the flash on the A900 if I need to use flash, although, in a way I like the fact that I do not have to remember that my A900 camera will accidentally flash if I\'ve forgotten that I had left it in either automatic or force flash mode (like with the S8200). The A900 does, however, have some very nice features that my Coolpix S8200 lacks: If I have captured an image in portrait orientation, I can see it at its full length when reviewing an image simply by turning the camera sideways (as I would with any other digital camera) , but I can still view the SAME image (albeit smaller) without having to turn the camera sideways. I also really like the fact that the A900 has a moveable LCD screen that enables me to take pictures from down low next to the ground to over my head, while viewing what the lens is seeing from a comfortable position. All in all, I really like my Nikon Coolpix A900 camera BETTER than my great Coolpix S8200 and will be sneaking it into future concerts that also forbid taking pictures or videos! (SUGGESTION: Why doesn\'t Nikon make a similar camera with a small viewfinder and a way of turning OFF the LCD screen on the back of the camera? I say this because, when I try to surreptitiously take photos in a darkened environment, the bright LCD is annoying to others sitting behind me, and, it is a dead give-away (while sitting in a concert where I am taking photos or videos) to the staff in a performance venue who will run over to me and tell me to put my camera away!)
• Reading the reviews here and based on my own experience with the A900, I\'d say that the it is not the camera for the more demanding or sophisticated user. I\'m not a demanding user or a photo hobbiest. I do mostly nature photography for my own study. I\'m not out for National Geographic. I want a compact, packable camera with some basic manual options, good zoom and good stabilization.I\'m only fussy about ease of use, interface design that allows me to adjust for changing conditions quickly. Given the complexity of cameras these days, the layout of this one seems intuitive. Your intuition may vary. I tried it against the Sony and Panasonic competing models. I get the sense that the firmware for all of them comes from the same factory.I shoot mostly in P mode, I can quickly adjust exposure compensation which does as much as most of the scene modes, though they can be handy. I think the optical zoom works well, though under some conditions at full zoom (notably low light) you may get some blur. That is not surprising. But under even less than ideal conditions I have found the autofocus adequately fast (is it ever really fast enough?) and the image clear.I can\'t comment on the movie functions. It works OK, but I don\'t use it much.The SnapBridge works transferring to my Sampsung tablet but it\'s a bit unpredictable and easier just to copy images to the computer.
• I am a big advocate for NIKON. This is not my first, nor my second, NIKON digital camera. The body (D800/ D5300 - even this one) is always sturdy and the lens on a Nikon is magnificent. My issue with the above referenced two was a question of portability - they are heavy to tote around on vacation or pack. So, it was with great anticipation that I bought the A900. I was banking on: the Nikon quality; and, the GPS.In short - look at something else if you want a second camera for travel purposes. The lens does a passable job but the MANUAL controls do not exist. On vacation with a tour group, I set it to AUTO so as not to hold the group up but this camera seems only to have an AUTO function that works. Disappointing. The WI FI/ GPS? It does not work with the IOS platform. Nikon knows this but nothing has been done to remedy the situation. Sadly it wastes the battery life and, if it does work (which it sporadically does), it picks the first point and gives that as the location for all the further pictures you take that day.It is small, light, sleek and the photos it takes are good enough but for 24 megapixels, they should be better but, sadly, are not. It does not make much noise and seems to operate fairly well as a basic point and click camera. it even has a screen that makes selfies quite easy.However, if you are looking for NEF files/ low lite situations/ long battery life (it really is shameful the short life span), then look further.NIKON really dropped the ball on this one.
• I really like this camera for it\'s ease of use and for the tilt display screen. I use it everyday for construction inspections so it gets heavy use. This is my second one. The first one lasted about 6 years when the tilt screen feature fell off only because the tiny little screws that mount it to the camera came loose and fell out into the dirt....to small to find. But like I said, I use it every day, all day long, turning it on and off and using the tilt screen to get just the right angle on something I couldn\'t see otherwise. It also has a nice zoom that allows me to zero in on a equip labels high up in ceilings and attics without having to climb a ladder and crawl to the equipment. I\'m going to have the first one repaired so I have a back-up.

Location:

Share :